MULTIUNIVERSES: INFINITY AND REASON

MULTIUNIVERSE

Infinity and Reason

The String theory scientists suffer in confusion. The riddle of energies and life is yet unsolved. The concept of a Universe made up by strings has developed to a Multiuniverse, one of which the one we hitherto we recognise as ours is but a fragment.

The mathematical contradictory equations giving at hand that our universe is expanding, or the opposite, is no longer relevant. Finding the genetic code of our universe in terms of an original string is yesterday´s news since every entity of the string can be multiplied with 1 times 500 ( a 1 and 500 zeros after ) and combinated differently or similarly in at least as many forms....

No mathematical equation is known to suffice to  explain. The quant physics and the scientist are globally depressed by the findings that there really is no end. Infinity laughs in their faces.

The Mayan indians already ”knew” this some 2000 years back in time or more. (depending on when the Mayans constitute a people or culture of their own). The famous or infamous Mayan Calender Circles related to the incomprehensible by ackowledging that there was something before the first circle and that the Great Circle (there have been several in their conception) which was to end in 2012 would be replaced by another circle. There was no Doomsday but a creed and conviction that great changes are going to come as they perceived with each debute of another circle. A beyond before the birth of cosmos in their conception is pragmatically described as ” the eras before the before ”, similar to some existing mathematical conceptions (Melanesia) that numbers range from one to seven and the rest is named ”many”. Pragmatism can be sophisticated...

Rationaltiy, (reason) derived from the Latin word rationalis (measurable; that has a ratio; knowing rationally; rational, of, possessing reason; theoretician; accountant) assumes a determination of quantity and space that can be comprehended and has borders. The borders, however, are dependent on the normative mindset in which it is understood, that is culturally determined, no matter how absolute and ”scientific” we are taught to believe.

Rationality is often understood in terms of Logic. There is no logic in Evolution such as the orthodox evolutionist Richard Dawkins has preached for decades. In his old age he admits it himself. Fortuitae, Chance, at random is stronger than all the natural laws we believe dominate and govern development on all levels even if we are trained to look for causality and effect. Without the latter we, however, would be lost, confused and chaotic. It is a vital tool to interact socially and to survive emotionally.

Words and terminology can be deceptive. Radice, root, is transformed into a an adjective or a noun, radical, with a connotation of a verb, to be in favor of measures taken to a change of what is perceived as having become rigid. ”Back to the roots” does not explain radical social changes. Radicalism, usually is understood as the shifting access to the means of production and reproduction and a change in the normative superstructure. The politically radical usually are upset by an uneven distribution of wealth on a local or a global scale. Radicalism is a reaction to the catatonic stupor of the establishment in all fields, be it in the Bellas Artes, social norms and set ups or a domineering paradigm

Scientific truths are not the invention of the Occident, but a reflection of what occidental priorities, needs and solutions govern as in any given society or culture. The diversity of ”scientifically ” accepted axiomes leans heavily on the versatility of the of different habitats in which they are expressed and implemented. Science is culturally determined even if we seemingly have a strong need for absolute and unquestionable truths. Without them we would become borderliners with small capability to interpret or respond to our world. The essence of sciene is to question, not to find impeccable confirmations for all times to come. The findings on the way, however, are essential to comprehend life and to find comfort in recognition.

Infinity is hard to grasp because we universaaly know that life, as we understand it, comes to an end, individually or environmentally.

Do we never learn from history? This is often desparingly asked when we globally do fatal mistakes over and over again. Of course, we do! Otherwise we would have become extinct as a species a very long time ago.

We may not grasp the concept of a Multiuniversity, an infinte number of universities and we do not even have to. There is so much for all of us to do to improve our inner universum and the exterior in terms of social interactions and cooperation on a local and a global scale. The staggering idea that we have to relate to infinity in everyday life is not very productive.

Caress your cat, walk your dog, take care of your health, nurture your friendships, continue to take in and, as far as your condition permits you, to the needs of the most vulnerable and do not beat up yourself because of your shortcommings. Everybody can do a little something. For yourself or somebody else.

The suggestion by the Putin administration, readily accepted by the UN, to demand of Syria to get rid of all chemical weapons and to which Assad seems to agree, goes to prove that villains and autocrats suddenly become wise men. Putin may have saved many faces, icluding Obamas and his own. That, to me, seems an excelent opening in order to work on a diplomatic solution. Maybe history, contray to our belief, has taught us something.

  

As it is, these remain: faith, hope and love, the three of them; and the greatest of them is love.

 Corinthians 1

Chapter 13

Douglas 2013